Do you might think it is better for students to your workplace before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, better to read.

PARAGRAPH 1
Practical experience, contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are two times as likely to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students will change their higher education course while at uni….

Lots of people think that it’s simpler to learn something in a group as opposed to individually. Do you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork could be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Many people believe that children have to do organised activities inside their time that is free while think that children must certanly be able to do what they want to accomplish inside their free time. Which viewpoint can you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent tests also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it will be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan
-possible ‘equipment’ to buy
-furthermore studies also show that the brain operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Lots of people say that globalisation additionally the growing amount of multinational companies have a negative influence on the environment. Which viewpoint essay writers do you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to support your answer. From what extent can you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your role.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in products or services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop for the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists genuinely believe that to be able to protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their lives that are daily. However, many people have never changed the real way they live. Why do you might think many people never have taken action that is individual? What might be done to encourage them to take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy associated with the commons
– Collective problem – simpler to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to encourage them to do something?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……

Some think that is the responsibility of men and women to deal with the surroundings. Others say it’s the national government that should be careful regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should care for the surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should look after environmental surroundings because:
They usually have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
allowed to be guardians for the country, this means collectively they have been guardians regarding the earth… yet not true the truth is

Conclusion
Both should really be doing more!

In many countries small shops and town centers are getting away from business, because individuals have a tendency to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This results in an increase in car use, and in addition it means that people without cars don’t have a lot of access to stores that are out-of-town. Do you believe benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?